Confirmed: a target "ab" that antcalls a and b individually doesn't exhibit the same problem.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2013-12-01, Steele, Richard wrote: > > > Thanks for the confirmation, I created bug #55831. > > Thanks. > > > I'm assuming this problem will also rear up with our (legacy build's > > mis)use of <antcall>, so this is actually pretty critical for us. > > Actually, <antcall> might "fix" it for you as each <antcall> will set up > a fresh instance of the <augment> RuntimeConfigurableWrapper and you are > not running the same task instance twice. > > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org > >
