Hello Morten, I am not aware of this problem.
How do you think that the behavior of ant's javac task should be changed ? Should it have an option to exclude the package-info.java files ? or exclude them by default ? Regards, Antoine On Apr 22, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Morten Sabroe Mortensen wrote: > I am very sorry to see all my "package-info.java" files being stamped with > the "anomalous package-info.java" statement from Ant and have javac > generate a lot of "Creating empty .../package-info.class". > > While not being in a OSGi environment and not having annotations on > packages, I do not at all find it "anomalous" to have my JavaDoc > documentation written carefully in package-info.java files. > > I have read the Ant manual under javac, last section. What is the rationale > behind forcing the generation of "empty" package-info.class files? > > When my javac task generates pages of output about > package-info.class-creation and for no apparent reason, I get really > scared. Contrary to most programmers, I actually care to write JavaDoc and > at the vary least state the intended purpose and responsibility of packages. > > To me, the current state of package-info.java-handling does not appear to > be sound at all. Is it sound? > > Someone care to comment upon the subject? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
