I mixed those up, it should be 1.6.5 to 1.8.2, curse my lysdexia. Thanks, -Nick
-----Original Message----- From: walla...@gmail.com [mailto:walla...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 7:34 PM To: Ant Users List; Vimil Saju Subject: Re: Upgrading ANT from 1.6.2 to 1.8.5 No the latest version is 1.8.2 -----Original Message----- From: Vimil Saju <vimils...@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 19:26:03 To: Ant Users List<user@ant.apache.org> Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <user@ant.apache.org> Subject: Re: Upgrading ANT from 1.6.2 to 1.8.5 Isn't the latest version of ant 1.8.2? I heard there will a 1.8.3 release soon, but did a 1.8.5 come out already? ________________________________ From: Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> To: user@ant.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Upgrading ANT from 1.6.2 to 1.8.5 On 2012-02-07, Cuneo, Nicholas wrote: > We're looking into upgrading ANT, and while doing various testing of > our builds between the two versions, we noticed some of our .class > binaries are different sizes, and was wondering what could cause the > binaries to be different between versions? I don't recall changing any of the defaults for javac, but 1.6.5 has been quite some time ago ... If you run "ant -v" javac will tell you the exact command line used and it should tell you what is different now. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the postmas...@nds.com and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. An NDS Group Limited company. www.nds.com
