I believe you're confusing the purposes of repositories and caches. Please review the cache concept - http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/concept.html#cache
You should _not_ be using cache as a repository; don't point both a resolver and a cache to the same directory structure. This is called on cache documentation<http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/latest-milestone/settings/caches.html> . Selectively killing cache contents sounds useful to me too. As for your publishing - each time you publish an artifact, is it a new [different] version - or are you always re-publishing with the same version? On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Richard_Senior <richard.sen...@gmail.com>wrote: > > In my opinion, Ivy needs the ability to publish to caches, as well as > resolvers. > We also need the ability to wipe individual caches by name. > Better yet there should be an ant task that allows for dependancies marked > in a particular way to be wiped from the local cache. > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Publishing...-tp31221641p31228706.html > Sent from the ivy-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
