On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:59, Gilles Scokart<gscok...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is indeed as designed, and it is pretty usefull because you can set the > property p in t1 or t2. This pattern is quiet often used. > >
Does this mean that you can: <target name="t1" unless="p, p1"/> or: <target name="t1" unless="p" unless="p1"/> ? Maybe this pattern is often used, but as I said, it looks pretty much counterintuitive to my eyes. If a property is dependent on the (non)existence of a property and this property does/does not exist, I don't expect this target to be executed at all. -- Francis Galiegue ONE2TEAM Ingénieur système Mob : +33 (0) 683 877 875 Tel : +33 (0) 178 945 552 f...@one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré 75116 Paris --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
