On 2009-06-03, Jim Garrison <jim.garri...@troux.com> wrote: > Part of my confusion came from trying to understand an existing build > that I just took over, in which there were some <ant> calls where > references were visible in the sub-ant WITHOUT inheritRefs=true.
> The build was running on Ant 1.6RC1, and stopped working when I > upgraded to 1.7.1. I've seen your mail but couldn't find any hint in svn for the behaviour you describe. Then again, I don't find any hint we've ever had a release called 1.6RC1 at all (beta1, yes, but there is no RC* tag). inheritRefs' behavior was always intended to be as it is now but it may be true that it was broken under certain circumstances at one point in time, I just can't remeber it. > This may have been a bug in 1.6RC1, but you have confirmed that 1.7.1 > is behaving as documented so I don't see a lot of value in trying to > recreate the problem with a simple set of build files in 1.6RC1. True. If it has been a bug, it is fixed by now. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@ant.apache.org
