--- EJ Ciramella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If this is a custom task/macro, couldn't you just
> programmatically
> generate that secondary fileset?

That is possible.  It would probably also be doable to
create a new includes pattern using <pathconvert> and
a file mapper and generate the new fileset
"Ant-ically" as well.

-Matt

> 
> This is out there on the fringe of my ant knowledge,
> so it's plausible
> you could do this within ant (with a refid or some
> other kind of
> reference back to the original fileset), but I can't
> say for sure and
> nothing pops out in the documentation.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivar Bratberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 3:33 AM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: RE: fileset manipulation
> 
> Ok, to be more precise:
> I have defined an ant macro , called
> "ftpWithChecksum".
> The purpose of this macro is to work as a layer over
> the ant ftp task.
> The macro will, as the name says, provide a check of
> checksums of the
> files.
> I want the corresponding checksum files to be
> downloaded from the same
> serverand directory.
> There is one checksum file for each ordinary file.
> The checksum file
> contains the MD5 checksum for the 'real' file.
> 
> When calling this macro I submit a parameter A which
> is the fileset.
> This fileset represents the 'real' files of
> interest.
> But in addition the macro should download another
> set of files,
> checksumfiles.
> So if the fileset A points to file a,b,c, then in
> the macro I would like
> to create a fileset
> B, which refers to files a.MD5, b.MD5, c.MD5. The
> attribute 'dir' should
> be the same as in fileset A.
> Then the "ftpwithChecksum" macro can call ant ftp
> task twice. First to
> download the 'real' files using fileset A, second to
> download the 
> Checksum files using fileset B.
> 
> My question is then.
> Is it possible to create the fileset B ? In case how
> ?
> Thank you for you attention and time.
> Ivar
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: EJ Ciramella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 6:55 PM
> To: Ant Users List
> Subject: RE: fileset manipulation
> 
> Are you talking about referencing the first file
> set?
> 
> Why not have two path refids?
> 
> Can I have a little more context to go with this
> question?  Where is
> this fileset getting used?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivar Bratberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:37 AM
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: fileset manipulation
> 
> If I have fileset A:
> 
> <fileset dir='.' >
> <include name="a" />
> </fileset>
> 
> Is it possible to get the following fileset by a
> command that takes
> fileset A as an argument in ?
> 
> <fileset dir='.' >
> <include name="a.extension" />
> </fileset>
> 
> Best regards
> Ivar
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



      

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to