Mario Madunic wrote:
Steve,
Thanks for insight.
That is too bad. Writing a new resource is beyond my talents at the moment (I'm
a taker not a giver at the moment).
Just a thought. Would it be easier to change the fail task to allow more than a
message (don't really know if it does more than this) and then allow fail to be
a child of all tasks (where warranted)?
<fail> is conditional; you can stick some condition inside it, and you
can use the return value from a property as part of a test. Do you need
more than that?
--
Steve Loughran http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5
Author: Ant in Action http://antbook.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
