On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 14:37 +0100, Peter Reilly wrote: > > Shouldn't javadoc task pick this artifact (package-info.java) given > that > > this file is meant only for the javadoc tool ? Why should the user > have > > to explicitly include it ? > 1) the fileset is not only used in <javadoc>
I was thinking may be Javadoc task can pick up the package-info.java while it is processing the input filesets. I am not familiar with Javadoc task's code, may be this not possible. > 2) package-info.java is used by other things than javadoc. Really, Like what other things ? I read that javadoc tool starting JDK 1.5 chose the name package-info.java precisely because it was invalid and couldn't have existed before. Thank you for taking time to respond. -Prashant > > > > > Do ANT-experts think including the package-info.java where ever its > > found too much magic ? > yes --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
