Just to add onto that theory:

http://security-protocols.com/advisory/sp-x16-advisory.txt

If remote desktop can only use a certain amount of memory, that could
explain memory cannot be allocated for object heap.

When in front of the physical machine, that memory limit does not exist.


Jeremy

On 8/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe the remote desktop takes too much memory so that Java cant get the
> 1.2GB....
>
> Jan
>
> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >Von: Moore, Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. August 2007 20:38
> >An: Ant Users List
> >Betreff: RE: Using ANT via Remote Desktop
> >
> >Every other product works.
> >
> >
> >
> >I worked with a third person and found they did not have the problem.
> >
> >
> >
> >So I started looking into differences in the machines.
> >
> >
> >
> >After a little poking around I determined the difference was
> >the two machines where it wasn't working had an environment
> >variable (ANT_OPTS=-Xmx1200m) set by default whereas the guy
> >who could run ANT scripts via Remote Desktop did not have the
> >variable set.
> >
> >
> >
> >When I unset ANT_OPTS (and when I lowered the value) I was
> >able to run ANT commands remotely.
> >
> >
> >
> >There was some reason I changed the value from 1000 to 1200
> >recently, and in retrospect that lines up pretty well with
> >when I started having the problem remotely.  Amazing how that works!
> >
> >
> >
> >I still do not understand why it is a problem remotely but not
> >when I am in front of the machine, but at least I now know
> >what the difference is!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >SKent
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:52 AM
> >To: user@ant.apache.org
> >Subject: AW: Using ANT via Remote Desktop
> >
> >
> >
> >Sounds like a problem with the remote desktop. Ant does not
> >know if it's started "directly" or "indirectly".
> >
> >
> >
> >Could you start other programs like Eclipse or NetBeans via
> >remote desktop?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Jan
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >
> >>Von: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Kent Moore
> >
> >>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2007 18:46
> >
> >>An: user@ant.apache.org
> >
> >>Betreff: Using ANT via Remote Desktop
> >
> >>
> >
> >>At work I have a fully patched WinXP SP2 machine.
> >
> >>
> >
> >>When in front of the terminal ANT works fine.
> >
> >>
> >
> >>When executing any ANT target remotely via Remote Desktop I
> >receive the
> >
> >>following message:
> >
> >>
> >
> >>C:\>ant init
> >
> >>Error occurred during initialization of VM
> >
> >>Could not reserve enough space for object heap
> >
> >>
> >
> >>The content of the target being run does not matter.  In this
> >
> >>case it was about
> >
> >>as simple as it gets:
> >
> >>
> >
> >><project basedir="." default="init" name="test">
> >
> >>    <target name="init">
> >
> >>        <tstamp/>
> >
> >>    </target>
> >
> >></project>
> >
> >>
> >
> >>I used to be able to do this, now I can't, and I am not the
> >
> >>only one in the
> >
> >>office with the issue.  I assume it involves a Microsoft
> >
> >>patch, but have not
> >
> >>been able to find a resolution.
> >
> >>
> >
> >>The same problem does NOT occur on W2K or W2K3 machines!
> >
> >>
> >
> >>Does anyone have an idea for a work-around outside of using
> >
> >>something like
> >
> >>Netmeeting or VNC?
> >
> >>
> >
> >>Many thanks!
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>
> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to