On 30 Mar 2007 04:38:00 -0000, query <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
I had tried compiling java code with debug option enabled earlier. That was
working fine. But I want to compile java source with debug option disabled.
What may be the reason for the difference in class file size? Can you please
let me know the reason?
The reason for the difference in class size is
the debug information in the class file.
Peter
I am a newbie to both java and ant!!!!!
>On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 Peter Reilly wrote :
> >You need to set the debug attribute to "true" on the javac task.
> >
> >By default the debug attribute is "false", this corresponds (since
> >I think ant 1.4) to -g:none.
> >
> ><javac debug="true" debuglevel="lines"> should give the
> >same debug info as the default commandline javac.
> >
> >Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >On 24 Mar 2007 07:27:13 -0000, first last <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I am new to ANT.
> >>Currently, iam using ANT 1.7 and java 1.5.0
> >>
> >>Earlier, I was compiling java files using command line javac.exe.
> >>Now, I am compiling java files using ANT javac task. Though the build is
successful, I observed that the class files generated using ANT javac task is smaller in
size compared to the ones compiled with command line java compiler. But the number of
class files and classfile names generated are same with both tools.
> >>
> >>Classpath is set properly.
> >>
> >>The syntax with javac task -
> >><javac srcdir="${component.source}" destdir="${component.classfiles}" source="1.4"
target="1.4.2" includes=**/*.java>
> >>
> >>Syntax with command line java compiler -
> >>javac -source 1.4 -target 1.4.2 -d $(classfiles) $(java_source)\*.java
> >>
> >>Can anyone please help me out????
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
