> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 2:15 AM > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: Python implementation for Ant > > Now, I am not going to evangelise Prolog on everyone, but I > found some > things really nice about going back to it > -its very graph centric. If you can walk the graph (especially > depth-first), then you get graph code for free > -lists are intrinsic to the language. Java only has arrays and > strings; no lists. So working with lists drops you down to > objects and > unwiedly operations. > -incredibly fast dev cycle. That is despite the fact it doesnt come > with IDEs as good as IDEA.
It's funny you bring this up; while following this thread and reflecting on the declarative nature of ANT, I was brought back to a previous life (late '80s) where I did a *lot* of development in Prolog. At the time I was using it for language parsing; I was actually able to successful parse COBOL using Prolog thanks to its ability to backtrack. If you've ever looked seriously at the syntax of COBOL you'll realize that it's LALR(infinite); you can't even lexically analyze COBOL programs without a wacky lexer (e.g., you can embed comments within tokens, and there is no cpp-like preprocessor). Anyway, it would be interesting to merge ANT and Prolog, especially if you could come up with semantics for backtracking (e.g., my build step failed, so walk back the dependency tree and "restore" everything back to the way it was). Just random musings from someone who's had way too little coffee so far this morning. Rick -- Rick Genter Principal Software Engineer Silverlink Communications <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
