Donald McLean wrote: > > Really? That sounds like a case of "The cure is worse than the disease." > > I can't imagine a single case where something like that would be a > better solution than the three or four techniques for providing static > attributes that I'm already familiar with. > > However, of course, YMMV. >
Hmm you mean I should leave the properties file out and create a static class instead? That sounds useful ... On the first attempt I wanted to use JAVAs Properties-class and so I used properties-files as base. Did I get you right? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANT-task-to-process-properties-files-into-static-class-tf2909466.html#a8131286 Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
