On 12/8/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1.) Make one xml file with the whole content > <echoxml file="tmp.xml"> > <root> > </echoxml> > <concat destfile="tmp.xml" append="true"> > <fileset dir="xml" includes="*.xml"/> > </concat> > <echoxml file="tmp.xml"> > </root> > </echoxml> or use the <header> and <footer> elements of <concat> : <concat file="tmp.xml"> <header><root></header> <fileset dir="." includes="*.xml"/> <footer></root></footer> </concat>
Eh guys, what about the <?xml> declarations??? AFAIK, you can't have those in the middle of the file, can you? OK, I'm just grumpy because I didn't think of it myself! ;-) But seriously, I think Ant would be more useful if we allowed custom SAX sources in <xslt>, to allow merging XML files like in this use case, or allow processing HTML files in XML by first normalizing it to XML using tag-soup, or allow processing any file for which there's a parser that can output SAX events. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]