--- Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Hello Sebastien, > > > > I am not aware of this. It would be a bug if : > > > > a) it is contrary to the specification of jar > files and of manifests > > > > or > > > > b) it causes the jar files to be disfunctional > > > > Actually, it makes sense that the format of the > manifest files be independent of the platform where > you run the build. > > > > The jar files themselves can be used everywhere, > and you should also be able to switch builds from > Windows to Unix or from Unix to Windows without > changes in the quality of the artifacts produced. > > It is not against the specifications and, therefore, > should not cause > the jar to be dysfunctional. Nevertheless it may as > well follow the > platform conventions.
Agreed; however I cannot locate a 1.2 manifest specification. Can anyone here say with certainty that all eol formats definitely were permitted prior to 1.3? -Matt > > Conor > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
