Not part of the "spec" per-se, but IIRC yes: writing out a properties file using the APIs in java.util.Properties will put a timestamp in the serialized output.
| ____________________________________________________________________________________________ | |
| Jeffrey E. (Jeff) Care | |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server Development |
WAS Pyxis Lead
Release Engineer
|
|
| |
Vinny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/08/2006 04:01:49 PM:
> Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately that only produces this at
> the top of the
> file :
> #
> #Mon May 08 15:57:42 EDT 2006
>
> ant 1.6.2 OSX jdk 1.5
> Are timestamps part of the Properties spec or something?
>
>
>
> On 4/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe with an empty comment <propertyfile comment="" .../>
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > >Von: Vinny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. April 2006 18:07
> > >An: user@ant.apache.org
> > >Betreff: Property Task's timestamp
> > >
> > >Is there anyway Ant to not put timestamps on the top of a
> > >created/modified property file via the Property Task?
> > >Thank You
> > >
> > >--
> > >Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > >additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ghetto Java: http://www.ghettojava.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
