Hi All,
The plainlistener that comes with AntUnit uses test target names as results names. Since two or more build files can define target named testFoo, this can lead to naming conflicts. JUnit has the same issue; it solves it by using fully-qualified test method names. Although one can write a custom AntUnit listener, it would be nice to standardize on the "fully-qualified" test target naming. Is there any plan or discussion of this? Thank you, Vladimir _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
