Why should? <mkdir> is responsible that the dir is present after its run. The first has to create it - so it sais that. The second not. Why printing?
I tried with -v and -d. I think with -d we could print the skipping ... >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Martin Gainty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 14:24 >An: Ant Users List >Betreff: Re: test for directory existence > >Stefan- >I guess Im confused >why doesnt mkdir show 2 success messages instead of the just >the first success message? >Martin- >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <user@ant.apache.org> >Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:18 AM >Subject: Re: test for directory existence > > >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Martin Gainty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> *Not sure about delete* >> >> it will fail if you tell it to delete something that isn't there - >> unless you set the quite attribute to true in which case it will >> simply do nothing. >> >>> but I know mkdir will fail if the folder is already in place >> >> No it won't. >> >> ,---- >> | <project> >> | <mkdir dir="foo"/> >> | <mkdir dir="foo"/> >> | </project> >> `---- >> >> leads to >> >> ,---- >> | [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/foo >> | >> | BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> | Total time: 1 second >> `---- >> >> The task doesn't even issue a warning message. >> >> Stefan >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
