Stephen McConnell wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-you can use the <different> selector to do byte for byte
comparisons of files. But that pulls all the remote data down
and can clog a network
Would an MD5 comparison be sufficient?
you probably don't even need a hash that strong. But you do need to
cache the hash somewhere, because if you have to calculate it on demand,
then you have just done the data copy that you wanted to avoid...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
