Have you migrated now, Steve? ;-) Main idea is that <copy> does the copy stuff. Why should we have a <copydir> <copyfile> <copypath> <copyresource> <copyWhatTheHellElse> ?
Jan >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. September 2005 17:57 >An: Ant Users List >Betreff: Re: AW: Copy files according ant property > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Sure - it´s not in 1.6.5. >> <copypath> is in svn head and maybe in 1.7 - but I think we will >> delete that task, especially because <copy> itself should now handle >> nested <path>s, because paths are ResourceCollections. And Stefan >> added that just yesterday :-) >> > >hey, I use copypath. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
