I don't see how this really helps, I'm sorry ;-) The problem is when you invoke *several times* a macrodef that uses <property> internally. You would need to use a different prefix (that what your entity is equivalent to) for the different runs of the same macro to use different property names.
Which is why the 'canonical' work-around is to base the name of the <property>s used on some likely-to-be-unique param of the macro itself, and do [EMAIL PROTECTED] to reference the 'internal' property. One could also of course have the macro require an extra param to be used as the uniq key or prefix to be used by internal properties, but that's pushing on a client of the macro something she shouldn't be aware of. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
