Dave Brosius wrote: > sorry, i realized i posted this under a copied message subject, which > made no sense..... > so here goes again. > > Howdy, I have my own task that requires two FileSet sub-elements. In order > to differentiate them from a naming point of view, i have created my own > tasks that are empty subclasses of FileSet, merely for the reason of > naming. > It works fine, but was just wondering if this was the expected way to > accomplish this? >
Not in general. The element name comes from the method used to add the instance, and not its type. So, use addFoo(FileSet f) and addBar(FileSet b) Conor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
