Yep, that was it! Thanks a lot for the help. 

-David

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 14:52
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: Why "Trying to override old definition of task xxx" message?

The problem is most likely the default value for the "dest" attribute
if you are using <ant>, <antcall> or <subant>

For example:
<project default="caller">
  <macrodef name="copy.compile.post">
    <attribute name="dest"
               default="${dir.bin.work}"/>
    <sequential>
    </sequential>
  </macrodef>
  <target name="called">
  </target>
  <target name="caller">
    <property name="dir.bin.work" value="."/>
    <antcall target="called"/>
  </target>
</project>

this issue was reported as bug 31215.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31215

This issue are happened a number of times, so I think
that the ant code could be modified to allow macrodefs that are different in
contents (due to property values changing) but otherwise the same to
be treated as "similar"  - resulting in a log message at verbose level and
not at warning level.

Peter

David Resnick wrote:

><macrodef name="copy.compile.post">
> <attribute name="includes" description="pattern of files to include in
>copy" default="**/*.dll **/*.exe **/*.map"/>
> <attribute name="source" description="root of dir to copy files from"/>
> <attribute name="dest" description="dir to copy files to"
>default="${dir.bin.work}"/>
> <sequential>
>  <copy todir="@{dest}" flatten="true">
>   <fileset dir="@{source}" includes="@{includes}">
>    <date datetime="${__bin.timestamp}" when="after"
>pattern="yyMMddHHmmss"/>
>   </fileset>
>  </copy>
> </sequential>
></macrodef>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:44
>To: Ant Users List
>Subject: Re: Why "Trying to override old definition of task xxx" message?
>
>What does the macrodef look like?
>
>Peter
>
>David Resnick wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I renamed the macro attributes (which were includes, source and dest) to
>>names that are definitely not in use, but there is no change.
>>
>>I also thought that the problem might be with the name of the macro
>>    
>>
>clashing
>  
>
>>with the copy task, but as I also have a copy.compile.pre macro that
>>    
>>
>doesn't
>  
>
>>cause the warning, that isn't it either.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 16:03
>>To: Ant Users List
>>Subject: Re: Why "Trying to override old definition of task xxx" message?
>>
>>If you use <ant> or <antcall> and if the "copy.compile.post" macro
>>contains text or attributes that have embedded properties (like "${name}")
>>which may change when the a new project is used, the macro
>>contents will be different and the ant core code will whine about
>>a change to the macro.
>>
>>There is a bug report about this (cannot remember the number) from
>>a netbeans developer.
>>
>>Peter
>>
>>David Resnick wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>As best as I can see it, I am only defining it once.
>>>
>>>This is the situation:
>>>
>>>There are 2 files: Main.xml and tools.xml. 
>>>
>>>In Main.xml (directly inside the project element) I have:
>>>     
>>>     <import file="tools.xml"/> 
>>>
>>>Inside targets in Main.xml I use the copy.compile.post macro.
>>>
>>>
>>>In tools.xml (also directly inside the project element) I have:
>>>
>>>     <macrodef name="copy.compile.post">
>>>             .
>>>             .
>>>             .
>>>     </macrodef>
>>>
>>>...along with a dozen other macros.
>>>
>>>
>>>copy.compile.post is the only macro that Ant complains about, and it only
>>>complains some of the time (I haven't been able to see a pattern about
>>>      
>>>
>when
>  
>
>>>it complains). 
>>>
>>>-David
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>>Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 15:25
>>>To: Ant Users List
>>>Subject: Re: Why "Trying to override old definition of task xxx" message?
>>>
>>>Looks like you are redefining a macrodef.
>>>
>>>For exmple:
>>>
>>><target name="compile" depends="copy">
>>> <macrodef name="doit" .../>
>>> <doit/>
>>></target>
>>>
>>><target name="copy">
>>> <macrodef name="doit" .../>
>>> <doit/>
>>></target>
>>>
>>>Would cause the macro "doit" to be defined twice.
>>>Normally, one would place macrodefs outside of targets
>>>and give them different names.
>>>
>>><macrodef name="copy_it".../>
>>>
>>><macrodef name="compile_it" ../>
>>>
>>><target name="compile" depends="copy">
>>><compile_it/>
>>></target>
>>>
>>><target name="copy">
>>> <copy_it/>
>>></target>
>>>
>>>Peter
>>>
>>>David Resnick wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>I have a project with a dozen macrodef definitions. Today I added 2 more
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>and
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>now get the message "Trying to override old definition of task xxx" for
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>one
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>of the new macros at the start of most targets. The message doesn't seem
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>to
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>have any effect on the build, but I would like to know why it suddenly
>>>>appeared.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone know?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to