Looks like your main question is how to accumulate,
then iterate, over these modules.  It looks as though
ant-contrib has some helpful tasks.  You could set a
new property for each of your modules:  module.foo=foo
or whatever.  Then it appears you could use
ant-contrib's propertyselector task with a select
attribute value of "$${\0}" (you might have to
experiment).  This should get you a single property
containing the property-expansion notation of all
matching properties.  You can then use this list as
input to ant-contrib's for task, calling your macro
for each module name.

Maybe food for thought, anyway...

HTH,
Matt

--- Mark Lundquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've been using ant for some time, but I'm no
> expert.  I just joined 
> this list.  And here's my question! :-)
> 
> Actually, I can't even think how to phrase this
> question in any more 
> general terms :-)... so I'll just describe
> specifically what I'm trying 
> to accomplish (part of it will only make sense if
> you understand 
> Subversion, but oh well).
> 
> I've got several "modules" that I need to be able to
> build into various 
> projects.  So what I think I'd like to be able to do
> is use <macrodef> 
> and then be able to just call out the modules like
> so:
> 
>       <module name="killer-app" />
>       <module name="job-security" />
>       <module name="legacy-crap" />
>       <!-- etc... -->
> 
> The idea is that this would
> 
> (a) build up a file that I can use to invoke "svn
> propset svn:externals 
> -f", then "svn update" the external 'mount-point' if
> it doesn't exist 
> — i.e., "fetch" the module sources into the local
> project;
> 
> (b) create a task for each module (e.g.,
> "modules:killer-app") that 
> calls <ant> in the module subdirectory and also does
> some other stuff;
> 
> (c) make it so that the task "module" invokes all
> the module targets.
> 
> I think I can handle all the ant machinery for (a)
> and (b); it's just 
> (c) that has me flummoxed.
> 
> This kind of thing is a way of life in 'make'...
> there, you don't even 
> think about it.  You can say:
> 
>       modules:; module.killer-app
>       modules:; module.legacy-crap
> 
> to successively add dependencies to a target.  So
> you can do the same 
> thing in a macro ("modules:; this_module" or
> whatever).  Or, you can 
> say
> 
>       MODULES += this_module
> 
> or
> 
>       MODULES = $(MODULES) this_module
> 
> (depending on the variant of make), and then later:
> 
>       modules: $(MODULES)
> 
> So there are a couple of ways in make, but I haven't
> seen that it's 
> possible to add a dependency to an existing target. 
> And Ant properties 
> are immutable, so I can't go that way...
> 
> BTW this isn't meant as an ant vs. make thing, I
> just mention it in the 
> hopes that maybe somebody else with a 'make'
> background will recognize 
> what the crap I'm talking about :-) :-).
> 
> Any suggestions?
> —mark—
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to