True, but it does mean that we Mac OS X folks can't tinker with it. We have a great, stable 1.4.2 environment, but no sign of JDK 1.5 until Apple decide to ship it. Maybe it'll be in 10.4, supposed to be released this summer.
Simon >-----Original Message----- >From: Alexey N. Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:58 AM >To: Ant Users List >Subject: Re: New Ant GUI - 'Ant's Nest' > > >Borland does the same - development JDK and tool host JDK do >not have to >be the same. > >- Alexey. > >Conelly, Luis (GE Energy, Non GE, GENE) wrote: > >>Hi, Chris, >> >> Is really necessary to use JDK 1.5?? I believe most of >the developments >>out there are being done in Java 1.4.x and prior (yes, >unbelievable, but >>true). I'd like to give a try to your product, but I don't >want to install >>another JDK in my Wintel machine (another one would colapse >my system). >>Would it work with JDK 1.4.2 or you're using those JDK 1.5 >features such as >>autoboxing? >> >> Regards >> -Luis >> >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
