At 10:09 AM 11/30/2004 -0800, you wrote: >Jake, > >I tried doing that via <ant> but it didn't really work -- IOW, it >didn't reinitialize. Should I use antcall instead? What's the >difference?
Did you set <ant> so that properties and references don't get propagated? See the Ant task manual for info on what attributes you need to set to do this. <ant> is actually the way to go here. It if doesn't work with <ant> (properly configured), it almost certainly won't work with <antcall>.
Jake
> >Thanks, >--Bill > > >On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:36:35 -0600, Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Does it work if you use <antcall> and (re)initialize the taskdef within the >> <antcall>? >> >> Jake > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
