On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 04:00 PM 11/26/2003 +0100, you wrote: >>One exit path would be <macrodef> without <local> in 1.6 and adding >><local> at any later point in time. > > So people can ignore the task until 1.7 when it will become > something more than nearly useless?
There are people who think it is useful even without it, but I agree, unless at least one other committer wants to support it for 1.6, <macrodef> will not be as strong as it could be in 1.6 - but certainly better than life without macrodef. > Why introduce a crippled task? It wouldn't be the first time 8-) > Give it all the functionality it needs and then release it. We have to do a release at one point in time, adding and adding new stuff has just lead us to where we are now - 18 months between 1.5 and 1.6. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
