On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> wrote: > On Tue 2017-02-28 16:28:11, Natale Patriciello wrote: >> It seems there is no interest in fixing bugs (such as [1]). Moreover, >> same guest filesystem (same host os, distribution, etc.) on two >> different machines (i7-2630 the first, i7-7700HQ the second) yield >> different results, with crashes and corruption of filesystem in the >> modern computer. So, can I consider UML as a legacy thing in the Linux >> kernel? With what I can replace it (I'm doing TCP research, and I focus >> on the networking stack)? > > Well.. if it worked before and does not work now, that's a regression > and will be fixed. Bisect would be useful. > > If it never worked on new CPUs, that's different situation...
Yep, a bisect would be good. Regressions are rather easy to fix. UML is more or less in legacy mode an I work on it purely in my very limited spare time. That's why I don't have time to track down and solve every single bug. -- Thanks, //richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
