On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 18:57 -0400, lanas wrote:
> Le Mardi, 29 Avril 2008 11:21:29 -0400,
> Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
>
> > You can make the smallest possible kernel that you can boot, but
> > it doesn't seem to me that much else will make a big difference in the
> > porting effort.
>
> I noticed this thread. By the subject it seems it's taken for granted
> that UML will run on a PowerPC. is this the case ?
>
> Al
The only reason I assumed there was PowerPC support was that there is a
directory sys-ppc (as well as sys-i386, sys-ia64 and sys-x86_64)
in /arch/um in the kernel source. I have idea about the condition of
those files; they may be age-old attempts for PowerPC-support only.
BTW, is there any difference between PowerPC and PPC? In /arch in the
kernel source, there is both a powerpc and a ppc directory. This has
always puzzled me. (I do realize it's a bit off-topic, sorry for that.)
Daniel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
