On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:39:24AM +0100, Massimo Rimondini wrote:
> The above results seem to suggest that the problem only affects 2.6.21
> hosts, provided that the "never failed" above is not due to a sequence
> of lucky coincidences. I have also tried with more than 2 UML instances,
> though, and still did not observe the problem.
OK, since it only appears to affect an old kernel and seems to have
been fixed since then, I would be tempted to just ignore it for now.
If some major distro decides to base itself on 2.6.21, we can look at
this again.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
