On Thursday 22 February 2007 00:51, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 21 February 2007 21:19, Jeroen van der Ham wrote: > > Blaisorblade wrote: > > > Using > /dev/null 2>&1 is not suitable? > > > > Well yes, that might also help. > > However, when you supply a daemon mode, I think it is also a good idea to > > add a silent feature, so that it is more easily and cleanly scriptable. > > Hmm. It's a possibility, implemented and attached (1st uml_switch-* then > use-sil_-funcs), but I don't like it. Unless we don't use syslog(3), or at > least errors early at boot are reported. I forgot: Stefano, Mattia, what do you think on this? Have you got any suggestion? I cc'ed you on last mail for this (and forgot Mattia because it's late and I'm tired). -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
