On 12/19/05, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 21:32, Christoph wrote:
> > On 12/13/05, Philip S. Hempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Christoph wrote:
> > >
> > > <chomp>
> > >
> > > >> stoph
> > > >
> > > > Hey Blaisorblade and all the others,
> > > >
> > > > does anyone have any idea what causes this instant segfault? I'm still
> > > > stuck here.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Christoph
> > >
> > > The most updated version of cpp seems to have fixed this.. for me.. I
> > > have successfully built a image that does not segfault on my AMD64 box..
> > >
> > > Not to find if I can get an image to boot with the built in on AMD64
> > > tls... sheesh
> >
> > I also upgraded my Debian/sid and now it's working for me as well.
> > 2.6.x kernels run  as UML, but 2.4.x still show a segfault.
> That could well be a different thing - I wish I could diagnose "a segfault",
> but it's a bit generic ;-).
>
> Also probably you can try if 2.4.28-bs2 (applies up to 2.4.31) works better.

I've built 2.4.28-bs2 and now I can boot it without any segfaulting.
The solution was basically to wait for a fixed binutils package in
Debian sid.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to