On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Rob Landley gibbered uncontrollably:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 07:09, Nix wrote:
> 
>> >  1. There are many files created in the current directory on the host,
>> > named like "1133497700-955364", containing fragments of the output, e.g.
>> > "Switching to runlevel: 0". This is really annoying.
>>
>> It's actually a feature for the paranoid; UML-2.4 (though not 2.6) can
>> log all that passes through all its TTYs :)
> 
> Ah, is that it?

At some point I might figure out how it worked and reimplement it, 'cos
I was using it and scanning the resulting logs for suspicious content,
correlating their file times with times I knew the system was in use by
legitimate users, and so on...

> I never could get 2.4 UM to work, and if I was going to have to debug 
> something anyway, 2.6 seemed the logical choice...

I had great trouble getting 2.6 to work (it had trouble working on boxes
older than i686 until 2.6.11 or thereabouts; Blaisorblade fixed it with
alacrity once I mentioned the problem).

-- 
`Y'know, London's nice at this time of year. If you like your cities
 freezing cold and full of surly gits.' --- David Damerell



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to