On Tuesday 04 October 2005 16:19, Alexander Charbonnet wrote:
> Okay. I'll need to figure out how to recompile glibc without NPTL then...
>
> FYI, it looks like Xen has found a way around this problem. Basically,
> they dynamically rewrite the NPTL instructions, with an overhead supposedly
> near zero. I don't know if something like this is possible with UML, but
> it sure would eliminate a whole class of questions on this list. And it
> would be an even bigger help for people with newer architectures where NPTL
> support is simply assumed.
>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2004-08/msg00050.html
>
> Thanks for your help!
Thanks for the info, but that doesn't apply to our case, for various reasons -
I am implementing TLS support for UML, it's just there are a few problems on
which we're stuck, and which are difficult to debug.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger: chiamate gratuite in tutto il mondo
http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
