On Friday 17 June 2005 20:46, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2005 00:32, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> > Dan Lund wrote:
> > > So essentially it's a system limitation that has to be coded around?
> > > Anything under 2048 will work it seems.
> >
> > Correct. I'm guessing that nobody has really tried to give it that much
> > memory before.
> >
> > Coding around it isn't too terribly difficult. It will just require a
> > reimplementation of mkstemp with O_LARGEFILE set.
>
> Would anyone test that recent glibc have fixed this (since it's a glibc
> bug)? I'll use the glibc code (I don't want to security-reaudit the thing);
> but not before July, I'm busy with exams for now.
Any progress on this?
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-user mailing list
User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
