On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled: > On Friday 22 July 2005 18:53, Ruaidhri Power wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:23:46AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: >> > Which was the old UML version? Which is your guest distro? >> > Also, have you tested the old UML releases on this new host kernel >> > version? Since UML address space is getting shrinked down to 32M, I fear >> > address space randomization (introduced in 2.6.12) may be playing a role. > >> It looks like VA space randomization is the culprit. The problem only >> shows up when the host is 2.6.12, and can be solved by setting the >> kernel.randomize_va_space sysctl to zero. Thanks for the pointer there. [...] > Doesn't this disappear when shutting off address space randomization?
Odd. I'm using a 2.6.13.2 host and 2.6.11.9-bs5 guest, and randomize_va_space works fine. It worked fine when I had a 2.6.12.x host, as well. Is there something subarch-specific here (unlikely), or is it Yet Another bad NPTL interoperation or something like that? -- `But of course, GR is the very best relativity for the masses.' --- Wayne Throop ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
