On Tuesday 08 February 2005 12:11, Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: > I am wondering what is the status of ubd=mmap these days. The guest > kernel I am interested about would be 2.6.9-bs5 (or bs6) - and the > upcoming 2.6.11, if all goes well with that. Both COW backed files, > plain files and LVM device files are interesting. > > Is is still known to eat filesystems, or is the web site out of date? > > The same questions about /dev/anon, with and without ubd=mmap. Both things are not working... ubd-mmap, also, cannot work, so it's going to be deleted from the code. No matter which version you use... > The reason I am wondering is more because ubd=mmap might hide another > problem we are seeing, Please provide a description... no idea about this. > though less memory usage is a nice boon.
> -- Naked -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
