On 11/4/18 10:40 AM, Geoff Canyon via use-livecode wrote:
I also added a "with overlaps" option.
My problem with the pWithOverlaps parameter is that is requires a priori knowledge of the data being consumed. If you already know there are overlaps then you'd set the parameter to true. If you don't know whether or not there are overlaps, then you'd need to set it to true so you don't miss anything (aside, of course, for the trivial case where you don't care whether or not there are overlaps - is there a use case for this?).
The only time you would set it to false is after you've already determined that there are no overlaps, and the time spent on that would probably more than offset the extra processing in the function.
-- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
