Bob, that make sense. But why do need those handlers? What not just use "of this stack"?
Obviously, I am oblivious to the number contexts where you require: "...created handlers that return the parent card or stack of an object." I am curious what they are? BR Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: > Me is resolving correctly for me in stack, card and behavior scripts attached > to them. The issue I think was that you cannot seem to reference card <x> of > me in a stack script handler. So I created handlers that return the parent > card or stack of an object. The object can be the long id of a card even, > when getting the parent stack, and that you can use in any reference so far > as I know. > > All it's doing is forcing the full card ID or stack name resolution so the > parser doesn't need to use fuzzy logic. > > Bob S - _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode