Richard: > Is that an actual test from the stack? The stack had (essentially) this: repeat with i=1 to 1234567 add sqrt(i) to n end repeat (LC 9 is 2.8 times slower.) So my latest experiment removed the inside line: repeat with i=1 to 1234567 end repeat (LC 9 is 2.8 times slower, again.) Have a go? It's all there to see and test! http://curryk.com/showdown.zip Best wishes, Curry K. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report
Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode Wed, 05 Sep 2018 21:11:59 -0700
- Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Sta... Tom Glod via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - ... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performanc... Tom Glod via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performanc... Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Perfo... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Sta... hh via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Sta... hh via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - ... Mark Wieder via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Performanc... Curry Kenworthy via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 Perfo... Mark Wieder via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC 9 P... Jerry Jensen via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC... Mark Wieder via use-livecode
- Re: Slow LC... Jerry Jensen via use-livecode