Hmmm... I have all three set on my mainstack and when I close it, the stack and it's substacks are not in memory. However, stacks I started using are.
Bob S > On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:49 , Knapp Martin via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > To answer my own question, although the Property Inspector will allow you to > set both the destroyStack and cantDelete properties of a stack to true, > cantDelete (when true) blocks destroyStack. I’d set cantDelete to true so > that I wouldn’t accidentally delete a stack or sub stack. But generally, when > I close a stack I want it removed from memory. So I’ve set cantDelete to > false for now. > >> On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Knapp Martin <martyknapps...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I have all my stacks configured with destroyStack and destroyWindow (gotta >> love those names!) set to true. And yet after I close them, if I check the >> revLoadedStacks() it shows that they and their subStacks are still loaded in >> memory. What do I need to do to get them out of memory?? Using LC 9.0.1 >> (rc3). I don’t see “obliterateStacks” in the dictionary ;) >> >> Marty _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
