Yes, yours is natural. Some of the others were stretching it a bit.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On August 5, 2018 11:10:47 AM Mark Waddingham via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
On 2018-08-05 17:36, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
This is getting pretty contorted and is becoming less like natural
language. For what it's worth, I have never been confused by the
current use of filter. I think of it as pouring soup through a wire
strainer. Filtering "with" keeps the solids. Filtering "without" dumps
them and keeps the liquid.
I honestly can't see how:
filter lines of X with Y
Is less contorted and more natural language than:
filter X by keeping lines matching Y
The former *requires* 'arcane' knowledge to comprehend (it is a
significant contraction of concepts - you need to know the contractions
precisely to understand it!) - the latter does precisely what it says -
it is actually a fully correct and full English sentence...
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
