Great article. One point I'd somewhat contend with is the notion that if 
technology is advanced enough it would be magic to someone first exposed to it. 
I think it would be better to say that it would seem like magic. If the 
inference is that magic is only technology advanced beyond current 
understanding, then I beg to differ. 

A great read by C.S. Lewis called Miracles (read that magic if you will) says 
that there are two kinds of "miracles": Those that involve the acceleration of 
what nature could produce if given the time, and those which nature in and of 
itself cannot produce. A healing would be the first kind. The parting of the 
red sea the second. I know I am skirting list conventions here but the examples 
are perfect for making my point about the difference between advanced 
technology, and what we really mean by "magic", if there is such a thing. 

Bob S


> On Jun 14, 2018, at 16:22 , Kurt Kaufman via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> I apologize that, in addition to being someone who almost never contributes
> to this list (although I do read the posts I can understand), when I
> finally do it's OT. But so it goes:
> 
> https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609048/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-ai-predictions/
> 
> Kurt


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
  • OT: Fascinating read Kurt Kaufman via use-livecode
    • Re: OT: Fascinating read Bob Sneidar via use-livecode

Reply via email to