Well, my last post just broke my own rule. But it wasn't a great suggestion so basically the rule still holds.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On May 10, 2018 12:13:34 PM Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

Thanks to Jacque who explained this to me some years back. (I won't say how many years out of respect...) ;-)

Bob S


On May 10, 2018, at 10:01 , Stephen Barncard via use-livecode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

I've been struggling with this dilemma for years. thanks

sqb

--
Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA -
mixstream.org

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:

It's not something you would put in a field. Focus on nothing is something
you send to lose focus on any object that currently has the focuw.


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to