This Me refers to the behavior object itself, not the object using the behavior. That is so that scripts referring to Me can be ported to a behavior without modification (I assume) and Me will still refer to the calling object. I suppose they could have used Real Me or some such thing.
I have never actually had a need to refer to the behavior object itself in one of it's handlers. The only use case I can imagine is if you wanted to send or dispatch to call a handler in the behavior, but it's already in the front of message heirarchy for the calling object. Bob S > On Jan 23, 2018, at 08:21 , Geoff Canyon via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > <snip> is there a reason to use "this me" which seems terribly awkward, over > "the behavior of me" which is to my ear far more straightforward​ (it didn't > require any additional code or syntax) if a bit more verbose? _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
