Tom, please excuse for using the wrong name. Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 19.12.2017 um 13:13 schrieb Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>: > > Todd, > i understand your desire to have such a feature in the Community Edition, but > I don´t think this will happen in near future. > > If i understood correctly then tsNET is a 3rd party product which Livecode > Ltd. has acquired or however this is called. So they have paid money for that. > > The tsNet external is really a big win for us and i think it is just fair > that this is only included in the commercial licenses. > > Why? Because there must be a difference between a free license and a paid > license otherwise everyone would use the free one. > And there must be a feature difference between different Indy and Business > license t for the same reason. > Btw. Xojo does it the same. The more you pay, the more you´ll get. With one > exception, they are not offering a free version. > > LibURL does and did its job more or less well for years. So at least there is > the possibility to do asnynchronous operations. > > Although i am a 1-man company and my revenues are less than $500,000 a year > and although i have a lifetime Indy license i > have subscribed for a business license just because of its features and the > possibility to get priority support if ever needed. > > The indy license btw.allows only 1 seat per organisation. A Seat (regardless > if Indy or Business) are for one named developer and > cannot be shared. If you need more seats you have to purchase a business > license with the appropriate number of seats. > It seems not all customers are/were aware of these terms in the past. > Otherwise Livecode Ltd. would not have sent out an email in October to all > Indy/Business customers with some information about the license terms and the > requirement to sign a digital license agreement. > > What i would vote for is to add SFTP (synchronous) feature to the Community > Edition to allow secure FTP transfers. > > Matthias > > >> Am 19.12.2017 um 00:50 schrieb Tom Glod via use-livecode >> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com <mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>>: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I use the Community version for project, and recently I've been working >> with the LibURL Library to get some asynchronous server client >> communication going ...and if you've ever worked with that ...... its clear >> there is much room for improvement there. >> >> Though I have no choice what version to use, so I can only wait in >> patience, but I think for the long term health of the platform and to give >> it the modern robustness it needs, the tsnet library is going to have to >> become part of the community version. Otherwise it will always lag behind >> from being able to use modern internet APIs in combination. >> >> Is this something we would have to crowd fund? >> >> Is there anything legally preventing that from happening? >> >> Thanks for any thoughts >> _______________________________________________ >> use-livecode mailing list >> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com <mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription >> preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode > > Matthias Rebbe > Tel +49 5741 310000 > https://matthiasrebbe.eu <https://matthiasrebbe.eu/> > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
