Good data, Jim. Thanks.
And drives the point home well for Peter and the rest of us:
Even in the US market, where larger monitors are more common, 1366x768
is still the most popular and a good choice to optimize for as a minimum.
One curiosity, though: what computers offer the 1536x864 resolution that
apparently 5.48% of users are running? I can't recall even seeing that
resolution in any spec listings.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Jim Lambert wrote:
>> RichardG wrote:
>>
>> With monitors, 1366x768 screens are by far the most common, the second
>> leading size only a bit more than half as popular, and it's a long tail
>> of single-digit market share from there:
>>
>> 1366x768: 29.87%
>> 1920x1080: 16.69%
>> 1440x900: 6.86%
>> 1600x900: 5.81%
>> 1280x800: 5.14%
>> 1024x768: 4.74%
>> <http://gs.statcounter.com/screen-resolution-stats/desktop/worldwide
<http://gs.statcounter.com/screen-resolution-stats/desktop/worldwide>>
>
>
> The most common USA screen sizes (below) are a bit different from the
worldwide stats (above).
>
> 1366x768 19.52%
> 1920x1080 17.66%
> 1440x900 10.11%
> 1280x800 6.95%
> 1600x900 6.34%
> 1536x864 5.48%
>
> If your app will only be used in certain regions then consulting the
> statcounter site, that Richard shared, can give you such regional
> reports.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
