What about the use of mobile-only commands… needing to always wrap them in 
something to keep the IDE from touching.

if "mobile" is in the environment then
  mobileControlSet tObject, tProp, tValue
end if  


> On Aug 10, 2017, at 6:50 PM, Monte Goulding via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 11 Aug 2017, at 11:45 am, Mark Wieder via use-livecode 
>> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> 
>> You know, if you'd post what you're trying to do it might be more possible 
>> to stay on target here. For instance, I regularly have to fill an array with 
>> constants in an initialization routine or use a custom property array filled 
>> with constants. Is that any help? Or are you looking to make a macro 
>> processor? Or a library of common <things>? Or something else?
> 
> A library of common <things> is probably the best description at the moment 
> but the use case is not reusable handlers as we have other means for that.
> 
> Basically anything where you follow a common pattern to do a thing but you 
> can’t abstract away so you don’t have to write the pattern any more.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Monte
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to