Well, that is reasonably obvious . . .
Presumably (?) that means that HTML5 things hived-off the Community
version of LiveCode are in readable Java-script and may be opened
and edited as such,
while the version of HTML5 available for $299/year hives-off protected code?
Richmond.
On 7/28/17 2:39 pm, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote:
Um. Like every other platform for LiveCode, there is an open source Community
version of HTML5. Not seeing the problem here? You pay for commercial, closed
source. You use Community free and share your code.
Regards,
Heather
On 28 Jul 2017, at 12:07, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
I just recieved an e-mail from LiveCode central offering me a licence for HTML5
for $299/year.
And that seems 'normal' considering my Indy licence does NOT include a licence
for HTML5.
BUT: the Community version allowed me to build an HTML5 thing.
That also seems a bit arsy-versy.
Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
