No judgment from me on this. On the contrary, most development mixes
languages from time to time, and I think it can be instructive to
observe where the dividing lines of natural usage are found.
So I was kidding, of course, in referring to LC as a "JavaScript
packaging tool", but maybe only somewhat:
Where we find ourselves using JavaScript to cover for something that's
hard to do in LC -- and vice versa, where we prefer doing something in
LiveCode because it's hard to do in JavaScript -- we may learn something
about the sweet spot of each.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
jonathandlynch wrote:
I am not trying to start a fuss - just find solutions for my particular problem.
This is what worked for me for this situation.
For situations where LC provides a full solution, it is MUCH faster to code in.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
On Jun 26, 2017 9:36 PM, "Richard Gaskin wrote:
With all the interest lately in bypassing the LC language to use an
embedded browser process, maybe we've found the winning slogan for LC:
"LiveCode: a great JavaScript packaging tool"
:)
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
-1
NOT my LiveCode!
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
